Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 21(1): e80-e83, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1000587

ABSTRACT

AIM: The inconsistent effects of lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) on COVID-19 seem to be caused by the therapeutic window. In the present study, we aim to present the effects of early LPV/r treatment on patients with severe COVID-19. METHODS: The demographics, characteristics, treatments, SARS-CoV-2 test results and outcomes of 19 patients with severe COVID-19 treated with LPV/r within 12 days of onset of symptoms were retrospectively assessed. RESULTS: Within 3 days of admission, three (15.79%) patients received noninvasive ventilation, and 16 (84.21%) patients received high-flow oxygen support. The median duration between the onset of symptoms and initiating LPV/r therapy was 9 (range 2-12) days. The median course of LPV/r treatment was 11 (range 7-17) days. One of the 19 patients (5.26%) died. Of the 18 patients discharged, the median hospital stay was 17 (range 11-45) days. At day 6 after LPV/r therapy was initiated, 68.42% of patients were virologically cured, increasing to 84.22% at day 12. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 who were treated with LPV/r within 12 days of the onset of symptoms, clinical improvement was observed in 18/19 patients (94.74%). Randomised controlled trials are urgently needed to further evaluate this strategy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Lopinavir/therapeutic use , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
Mini Rev Med Chem ; 21(3): 268-272, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-895211

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndromerelated coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has become an ongoing pandemic worldwide. However, there are no vaccines or antiviral drugs with proven clinical efficacy. Therefore, a remedial measure is urgently needed to combat the devastating COVID-19. The pharmacological activities of Nacetylcysteine (NAC) and its potential functions in inhibiting the progression of COVID-19 make it a promising therapeutic agent for the infection. In this mini-review, we discussed the therapeutic potential of NAC in COVID-19 from the perspective of its multisite pharmacological actions.


Subject(s)
Acetylcysteine/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , COVID-19/complications , Drug Design , Drug Repositioning , Humans , Nitric Oxide/metabolism , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism
3.
Dermatol Ther ; 33(4): e13745, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-644313

ABSTRACT

Protecting health care workers is crucial during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and facemask wearing is considered an effective measure to prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. However, long-time use of a facemask can cause pressure sores on the ears and nose bridge and increase the risk of infection. The topical recombinant human acidic fibroblast growth factor (rh-aFGF) was used to cure pressure sores for health care workers at Zhongfaxincheng campus of Tongji Hospital. The results from a small sample size survey conducted in Zhongfaxincheng campuses of Tongji Hospital showed that treatment with topical rh-aFGF could significantly inhibit the progression of pressure sores and accelerate the wound healing with no apparent ill-effects. Therefore, we propose that topical rh-aFGF is an effective therapeutic agent for facemask wearing-induced pressure sores and worth of popularizing and applying.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Fibroblast Growth Factor 1/administration & dosage , Masks/adverse effects , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/drug therapy , Administration, Topical , COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , SARS-CoV-2
4.
J Med Virol ; 92(11): 2523-2527, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-601818

ABSTRACT

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) garnered scientific attention in early February following publication of reports showing in vitro activity of chloroquine (CQ) against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). While studies are mixed on this topic, the therapeutic effect of HCQ or CQ still need more valid clinical evidence. In this descriptive observational study, we aimed to discuss the treatment response of HCQ in COVID-19 infected patients and 30 cases were included. The demographic, treatment, laboratory parameters of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) before and after HCQ therapy and clinical outcome in the 30 patients with COVID-19 were assessed. To evaluate the effect of mediation time point, we also divided these cases into two groups, patients began administrated with HCQ within 7 days hospital (defined as early delivery group) and 7 days after hospital (defined as later delivery group). We found that, the elevated IL-6, a risk factor in severe patients were reduced to normal level after HCQ treatment. More importantly, patients treated with HCQ at the time of early hospital recovered faster than those who treated later or taken as second line choose for their obvious shorter hospitalization time. In summary, early use of HCQ was better than later use and the effect of IL-6 and CRP level cannot be ruled out.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alanine Transaminase/blood , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Antimalarials/administration & dosage , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , China , Cytokines/blood , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/administration & dosage , Interleukin-6/blood , Lymphopenia/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Young Adult
5.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 28(1): e1, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-426562
6.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 103(1): 69-72, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-351366

ABSTRACT

Metformin was proposed to be a candidate for host-directed therapy for COVID-19. However, its efficacy remains to be validated. In this study, we compared the outcome of metformin users and nonusers in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with diabetes. Hospitalized diabetic patients with confirmed COVID-19 in the Tongji Hospital of Wuhan, China, from January 27, 2020 to March 24, 2020, were grouped into metformin and no-metformin groups according to the diabetic medications used. The demographics, characteristics, laboratory parameters, treatments, and clinical outcome in these patients were retrospectively assessed. A total of 283 patients (104 in the metformin and 179 in the no-metformin group) were included in this study. There were no significant differences between the two groups in gender, age, underlying diseases, clinical severity, and oxygen-support category at admission. The fasting blood glucose level of the metformin group was higher than that of the no-metformin group at admission and was under effective control in both groups after admission. Other laboratory parameters at admission and treatments after admission were not different between the two groups. The length of hospital stay did not differ between the two groups (21.0 days for metformin versus 19.5 days for no metformin, P = 0.74). However, in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the metformin group (3/104 (2.9%) versus 22/179 (12.3%), P = 0.01). Antidiabetic treatment with metformin was associated with decreased mortality compared with diabetics not receiving metformin. This retrospective analysis suggests that metformin may offer benefits in patients with COVID-19 and that further study is indicated.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Metformin/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , China , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 55(6): 105995, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-164767

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the previously unknown pathogen, severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is now a global pandemic. There are no vaccines or specific treatments against this new virus; therefore, there is an urgent need to advance novel therapeutic interventions for COVID-19. Glycyrrhizin is a triterpene saponin with various biological functions and pharmacological effects. This brief article discusses the therapeutic potential of glycyrrhizin for the treatment of COVID-19 from the perspective of its pharmacological action, including binding angiotensin-converting enzyme II (ACE2), downregulating proinflammatory cytokines, inhibiting the accumulation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), inhibiting thrombin, inhibiting the hyperproduction of airway exudates, and inducing endogenous interferon.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Glycyrrhizic Acid/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 , COVID-19 , Cytokines/blood , Humans , Interferons/biosynthesis , Interferons/immunology , Pandemics , Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/metabolism , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2 , Virus Attachment/drug effects , Virus Internalization/drug effects , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
8.
J Med Virol ; 92(7): 814-818, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-34889

ABSTRACT

Tocilizumab (TCZ), a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-6 (IL-6), emerged as an alternative treatment for COVID-19 patients with a risk of cytokine storms recently. In the present study, we aimed to discuss the treatment response of TCZ therapy in COVID-19 infected patients. The demographic, treatment, laboratory parameters of C-reactive protein (CRP) and IL-6 before and after TCZ therapy and clinical outcome in the 15 COVID-19 patients were retrospectively assessed. Totally 15 patients with COVID-19 were included in this study. Two of them were moderately ill, six were seriously ill and seven were critically ill. The TCZ was used in combination with methylprednisolone in eight patients. Five patients received the TCZ administration twice or more. Although TCZ treatment ameliorated the increased CRP in all patients rapidly, for the four critically ill patients who received an only single dose of TCZ, three of them (No. 1, 2, and 3) still dead and the CRP level in the rest one patient (No. 7) failed to return to normal range with a clinical outcome of disease aggravation. Serum IL-6 level tended to further spiked firstly and then decreased after TCZ therapy in 10 patients. A persistent and dramatic increase of IL-6 was observed in these four patients who failed treatment. TCZ appears to be an effective treatment option in COVID-19 patients with a risk of cytokine storms. And for these critically ill patients with elevated IL-6, the repeated dose of the TCZ is recommended.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Disease Outbreaks , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Biomarkers/blood , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Interleukin-6/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
9.
researchsquare; 2020.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-18380.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: The novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) was entered into the critical period of epidemic prevention. Our hospital was designated as a hospital for severe pneumonia in Wuhan. Timely and effective pharmaceutical emergency support system is of great significance for the epidemic prevention and control of COVID-19. Method:In order to ensure COVID-19 patients' medication needs and ensure the safety treatment, we focus on the key points and difficult problems in the practice of pharmaceutical management during the period of COVID-19, and then formulate appropriate pharmaceutical emergency support system combined with clinical practice. Results:The pharmaceutical department quickly launched the emergency mechanism, formulated the key drug catalog for COVID-19, purchased some treatment drugs, reformed the emergency pharmacy process, established the donated drug management system, established the pharmacist consultation team, set up the "cloud pharmacy" for patients with chronic diseases other than COVID-19, and strengthened pharmacist protection management. Conclusion:During the period of COVID-19, the pharmaceutical administration is a professional, comprehensive, complex and systematic emergency project to ensure the drug supply and safety administration.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections , Pneumonia , Chronic Disease
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL